That is a funny thing to state when you wrote:
“That said, there will be many updates about Filecoin over the coming weeks, leading up to the Filecoin sale. Those updates will provide plenty of information.”
You mentioned the “Filecoin sale.” I did not initiate any comments about ICOs - you did.
I do not like double standards. In fact I loath them. I see them a lot. If you think that ICO comments are not useful, then don’t start bring the Filecoin sale into my question about comparison of P2P storage systems, especially in the context of you saying it is “sister project” to IPFS.
My interest is in IPFS and trying to get it to work and deciding what systems to use, I asked a question and you started writing about the Filecoin sale. I just googled it, and Filecoin is all over the Web with a clear commercial interest.
It sounds like you are just hijacking my question about file systems, to promote the Filecoin ICO. Then saying you do not want any discussion about competing systems. That is exactly the sentiment I saw in stackexchange when a valid question about storage was hijacked and used to make accusations of “fake news” and led to someone saying:
“Thank you for your comment. Could you give me more details about Ipfs and swarm. It seems indeed that the previous answer is quite biased”
You are not entitled to hijack my question about storage systems to promote a Filecoin ICO and then tell me to shut up when I respond to that by mentioning the ICO market.